Article cité par

La fonctionnalité Article cité par… liste les citations d'un article. Ces citations proviennent de la base de données des articles de EDP Sciences, ainsi que des bases de données d'autres éditeurs participant au programme CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. Vous pouvez définir une alerte courriel pour être prévenu de la parution d'un nouvel article citant " cet article (voir sur la page du résumé de l'article le menu à droite).

Article cité :

Order-by-order uncertainties of nucleon-nucleon Wolfenstein amplitudes in chiral effective field theory

B. McClung, Ch. Elster and D. R. Phillips
Physical Review C 111 (6) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1103/jq4y-ydhk

Inference of the low-energy constants in Δ -full chiral effective field theory including a correlated truncation error

Isak Svensson, Andreas Ekström and Christian Forssén
Physical Review C 109 (6) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.064003

FEASIBILITY OF MODEL-INDEPENDENT RECONSTRUCTION OF THE AMPLITUDES OF THE pp ELASTIC SCATTERING MATRIX AT THE SPASCHARM FACILITY AT U-70

M. B Nurusheva, A. A Bogdanov, V. P Ladygin, V. V Moiseev, V. V Mochalov and P. A Semenov
Âdernaâ fizika 87 (4) 328 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044002724040021

Analyzing Power Measurements of Quasi-Elastic Proton–Proton Scattering at the Intermediate Energies at the Nuclotron Internal Target

I. S. Volkov, A. V. Averyanov, I. E. Vnukov, Yu. V. Gurchin, D. Enache, A. Yu. Isupov, J.-T. Karachuk, D. O. Krivenkov, P. K. Kurilkin, V. P. Ladygin, A. N. Livanov, S. M. Piyadin, S. G. Reznikov, Ya. T. Skhomenko, A. A. Terekhin, A. V. Tishevsky, E. V. Chernykh and M. Janek
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 87 (S3) S438 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778824701072

Perturbative computations of neutron-proton scattering observables using renormalization-group invariant chiral effective field theory up to N3LO

Oliver Thim, Andreas Ekström and Christian Forssén
Physical Review C 109 (6) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.064001

Bethe-Heitler lepton pair production in the deuteron breakup reaction*

Mengchu 孟初 Cai 蔡, Tianbo 天博 Liu 刘 and Bo-Qiang 伯强 Ma 马
Chinese Physics C 48 (1) 014103 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ad0375

Comparison of the state-of-the-art nucleon–nucleon potentials from phase shift to nuclear matter

Ke Nan, Jinniu Hu, Ying Zhang and Hong Shen
International Journal of Modern Physics E 33 (11) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301324500538

Assessing correlated truncation errors in modern nucleon-nucleon potentials

P. J. Millican, R. J. Furnstahl, J. A. Melendez, D. R. Phillips and M. T. Pratola
Physical Review C 110 (4) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044002

Feasibility of Model-Independent Reconstruction of the Amplitudes of the pp Elastic Scattering Matrix at the SPASCHARM Facility at U-70

M. B. Nurusheva, A. A. Bogdanov, V. P. Ladygin, V. V. Moiseev, V. V. Mochalov and P. A. Semenov
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 87 (4) 464 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778824700339

Bayesian analysis of chiral effective field theory at leading order in a modified Weinberg power counting approach

Oliver Thim, Eleanor May, Andreas Ekström and Christian Forssén
Physical Review C 108 (5) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.054002

Wave-function-based emulation for nucleon-nucleon scattering in momentum space

A. J. Garcia, C. Drischler, R. J. Furnstahl, J. A. Melendez and Xilin Zhang
Physical Review C 107 (5) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.054001

Elastic scattering based on energy-dependent relativistic Love-Franey model at energies between 20 and 800 MeV*

Si-Na Wei and Zhao-Qing Feng
Chinese Physics C 47 (6) 064104 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/accb88

Wave-packet continuum discretisation for nucleon–nucleon scattering predictions

Sean B S Miller, Andreas Ekström and Christian Forssén
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 49 (2) 024001 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac3cfd

Possible Studies at the First Stage of the NICA Collider Operation with Polarized and Unpolarized Proton and Deuteron Beams

V. V. Abramov, A. Aleshko, V. A. Baskov, et al.
Physics of Particles and Nuclei 52 (6) 1044 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779621060022

Partial-wave correlations with uncertainties in the two-nucleon system

Adolfo Guevara Escalante, Rodrigo Navarro Pérez and Enrique Ruiz Arriola
Physical Review C 104 (5) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.054002

Analytical reconstruction of pp elastic scattering amplitudes from the complete sets of experiments at the SPASCHARM facility at U70

A A Bogdanov, V A Chetvertkova, A V Kozelov, et al.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1690 (1) 012084 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1690/1/012084

Bayesian optimization in ab initio nuclear physics

A Ekström, C Forssén, C Dimitrakakis, et al.
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 46 (9) 095101 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab2b14

Proposal of the complete experiment for elastic pp and p(bar)p scattering at SPASCHARM program at U70 accelerator

A A Bogdanov, V A Chetvertkova, N K Kalugin, et al.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1390 (1) 012032 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1390/1/012032

Bayesian truncation errors in chiral effective field theory: Nucleon-nucleon observables

J. A. Melendez, S. Wesolowski and R. J. Furnstahl
Physical Review C 96 (2) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024003

Structure effects in polarization and cross sections for A(p, p’)X inelastic reactions on 40Ca and 12C nuclei at 1 GeV

O. V. Miklukho, A. Yu. Kisselev, G. M. Amalsky, et al.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 80 (2) 299 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778817010136

Synthetic observations of molecular clouds in a galactic centre environment – I. Studying maps of column density and integrated intensity

Erik Bertram, Simon C. O. Glover, Paul C. Clark, Sarah E. Ragan and Ralf S. Klessen
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (4) 3763 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2619

The low-energy structure of the nucleon–nucleon interaction: statistical versus systematic uncertainties

R Navarro Pérez, J E Amaro and E Ruiz Arriola
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 43 (11) 114001 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/11/114001

Uncertainty Analysis and Order-by-Order Optimization of Chiral Nuclear Interactions

B. D. Carlsson, A. Ekström, C. Forssén, et al.
Physical Review X 6 (1) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.011019

Minimally nonlocal nucleon-nucleon potentials with chiral two-pion exchange includingΔresonances

M. Piarulli, L. Girlanda, R. Schiavilla, et al.
Physical Review C 91 (2) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024003

Toward polarized antiprotons: Machine development for spin-filtering experiments

C. Weidemann, F. Rathmann, H. J. Stein, et al.
Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams 18 (2) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.18.020101

Proton electromagnetic form factors: Basic notions, present achievements and future perspectives

Simone Pacetti, Rinaldo Baldini Ferroli and Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson
Physics Reports 550-551 1 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.005

Coarse-grained potential analysis of neutron-proton and proton-proton scattering below the pion production threshold

R. Navarro Pérez, J. E. Amaro and E. Ruiz Arriola
Physical Review C 88 (6) (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064002

Polarization effects in the quasielastic (p, 2p) reaction with the nuclear S-Shell Protons at 1 GeV

O. V. Miklukho, A. Yu. Kisselev, D. A. Aksenov, et al.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 76 (7) 871 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778813070119

Microscopic approach to the proton asymmetry in the nonmesonic weak decay ofΛhypernuclei

E. Bauer, G. Garbarino, A. Parreño and A. Ramos
Physical Review C 85 (2) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024321

Influence of Coulomb distortion on polarization observables in elastic electromagnetic hadron-lepton scattering at low energies

Hartmuth Arenhövel
Physical Review C 84 (4) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.045502

Extracting the photoproduction cross sections off the neutron, via theγn→π−preaction, from deuteron data with final-state interaction effects

V. E. Tarasov, W. J. Briscoe, H. Gao, A. E. Kudryavtsev and I. I. Strakovsky
Physical Review C 84 (3) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.035203

Exploring parameter space effects on structure-property relationships of surfactants at liquid-liquid interfaces

Christopher P. Emborsky, Kenneth R. Cox and Walter G. Chapman
The Journal of Chemical Physics 135 (8) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3628452

Analysis of data on proton-proton scattering in the energy range 100–1300 MeV

V. G. Vovchenko, V. V. Polyakov and O. Ya. Fedorov
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 73 (3) 420 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377881003004X

Measurement of the polarization correlation parameter C nn in the pp elastic scattering with an unpolarized proton target and an unpolarized 1-GeV proton beam

O. V. Miklukho, A. Yu. Kisselev, G. M. Amalsky, et al.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 73 (6) 927 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778810060037

Review of quasi-elastic charge-exchange data in the nucleon-deuteron breakup reaction

F. Lehar and C. Wilkin
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters 7 (4) 235 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477110040035

The ratio R dp of the quasielastic nd → p(nn) to the elastic np → pn charge-exchange-process yields at the proton emitting angle θ p,lab = 0° over 0.55–2.0 GeV neutron beam energy region. Experimental results

V. I. Sharov, A. A. Morozov, R. A. Shindin, et al.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 72 (6) 1007 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778809060131

Measurements of the ratio Rdp of the quasi-elastic nd $ \rightarrow$ p(nn) to the elastic np $ \rightarrow$ pn charge-exchange process yields at zero proton emission angle over the 0.55-2.0 GeV neutron beam energy region

V. I. Sharov, A. A. Morozov, R. A. Shindin, et al.
The European Physical Journal A 39 (3) 267 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2008-10719-x

The Ratio R dp of the quasielastic nd → p(nn) to the elastic np → pn charge-exchange-process yields at the proton emitting angle θ p,lab = 0° over 0.55–2.0 GeV neutron-beam energy region. Comparison of the results with the model-dependent calculations

V. I. Sharov, A. A. Morozov, R. A. Shindin, et al.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 72 (6) 1021 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778809060143

Search for the NN → 6q phase transition in the np-polarized measurements at T kin = 1–6 GeV

L. N. Strunov, V. G. Antonenko, S. B. Borzakov, et al.
The European Physical Journal Special Topics 162 (1) (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2008-00784-9

Spin observables in elastic np interaction in the energy range 230–590 MeV. Complete experiment

M. Finger
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters 4 (6) 503 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S154747710706009X

Solution of the Spectator Equation for Relativistic NN Scattering Without Partial Wave Expansion

G. Ramalho, A. Arriaga and M. T. Peña
Few-Body Systems 39 (3-4) 123 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-006-0161-3

Experimental determination of the complete spin structure forp¯p→Λ¯Λatpp¯=1.637GeV/c

K. D. Paschke, B. Quinn, A. Berdoz, et al.
Physical Review C 74 (1) (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.015206

Measurements of the total-cross-section difference Δσ L(np) at 1.39, 1.69, 1.89, and 1.99 GeV

V. I. Sharov, N. G. Anischenko, V. G. Antonenko, et al.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 68 (11) 1796 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1134/1.2131111

Excitation functions of spin correlation parametersANN,ASS, andASLin elastic→p→pscattering between 0.45 and 2.5 GeV

F. Bauer, J. Bisplinghoff, K. Büsser, et al.
Physical Review C 71 (5) (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.054002

Measurements of energy behaviour of spin-dependentnp—observables over 1.2–3.7 GeV energy region Dubna “Delta-Sigma” Experiment

V. I. Sharov, N. G. Anischenko, V. G. Antonenko, et al.
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 55 (S1) A289 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032015

Excitation functions of the analyzing power in elastic proton-proton scattering from 0.45 to 2.5 GeV

M. Altmeier, F. Bauer, J. Bisplinghoff, et al.
The European Physical Journal A 23 (2) 351 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2004-10081-1